Reccing vs Reposting; fandom etiquette musings
I was going to do some drawing tonight, but ended up doing this instead. This needs saying.
OK, so I just thought I'd post a note after all the kerfuffle on tumblr today regarding a totally amazing piece of art that was posted at the
![[profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
And I want to say that this is me just getting this off my chest. No fingers being pointed other than the parties directly involved in this particular case.
ANYWAY. The point being, some knucklehead on tumblr decided to not read the rather POINTED and CLEAR statement just below the art, in which it was stated that the art was NOT TO BE REPOSTED ANYWHERE without the artist's express permission. Given that the art fest is currently anonymous, there is NO WAY to get the artist's permission. But this person posted the art to their tumblr anyway. Not a LINK to the post with the art, but the actual image itself.
Now, being amazing, it attracted a lot of positive attention. Which is lovely, except that none of that attention was given to the ARTIST. It was all being given to the knucklehead, who had nothing to do with actually creating the art. I don't care if the artist doesn't have a tumblr. I don't care if you have the attention span and patience of a gnat. You ask the artist if it's okay, FIRST.
My confusion and frustration has to do with why it seems to not be clear that re-posting someone's art without permission is not cool. The analogy I've seen a lot from various friends today has been that you wouldn't repost a fic in it's entirety, that would be blatant plagarism, so why is it somehow perceived as OK to do it with art? That, somehow, posting to a platform that the artist doesn't have an account for is doing them a FAVOR somehow. I'm sorry, but I wouldn't post your fic to AO3 for you, please don't post my art to tumblr for me.
My feelings on this are that it would have been fine to flail about how lovely the art was and to post a LINK to the original post, where others could also leave happy comments in a place where the artist can receive due credit. Essentially, a rec post.
I have had several of my pieces re-posted to tumblr (and one to facebook, oddly), most without my knowledge. In every case so far, the person reposting has always credited me and provided a link back to my original post where they found the art. That makes it marginally better. But I would have been much happier if they had just ASKED ME FIRST. Instead of me hearing about it from a friend, or me finding it by doing a vanity google. Which I do, from time to time, just to see if anyone has lifted any of my stuff recently. Which is pretty sad, really.
I mean, I know it's the internet, and that once it's online, it's not really just mine anymore.
Except that, really, it IS. I deserve credit for making it, and I deserve to see if it makes people happy, and I deserve to read the comments, because that's the ONLY payment I will ever receive for any of it.
no subject
no subject
no subject
*loves*
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I completely agree with you on this and the frustrating downside of Tumblr, but below the art, it says "do not use it..." The word "repost" is not specifically used.
This artwork is the sole property of the artist who created it.
Please do not use it, in whole or in part, without the expressed consent of the artist.
For me, I don't see use and repost as synonyms. If others do, then I'm the odd person out here. To me, do not use means do not use the image to make graphics without expressed consent. Do not repost means as you say, someone who's not the artist sticking the original image on Tumblr for example and having people reblog it without the artist knowing the true level of appreciation their artwork is receiving.
I think to better the rule, "do not repost" should explicitly be mentioned to add to the do not use. Since people are reposting on Tumblr, then maybe they've been deciding "do not use" only applies to graphics-making with another's work not to a simple reposting of the unaltered work...
ETA: This issue was brought up at the Merlin art fest comm so the mods are aware of it. Sorry for addressing it here too ... I guess in the end people should take "do not use" as meaning do not repost at all without consent.
no subject
"Use" does imply that you make some kind of transformation on the work, ie take the manip and make it a part of another manip, or do a drawing based on it. And that's a pretty common sense thing to NOT do with someone art without asking them about it first. Though there are folks who don't understand that either. Reni had to chase one down last year and report them to the Stop Plagiarism folks.
"Reposting" seems to be something that a lot of fans are OK with, but I stand by my analogy of reposting art as being like me reposting a fic in it's entirety on my DeviantArt journal with a note on the end saying, "Oh, BTW, it's not mine, it's this person's". Put that way, it's obvious that it's really NOT okay.
And I agree that this highlights that perhaps the note on the art fest pieces should include something SPECIFIC about not reposting, though I would have thought that an *unsigned, anonymous* piece of art would be a rather obvious POOR choice to repost, as it would be so EASY for someone unscrupulous to STEAL. Especially since no permission was asked for from the artist, because it's anonymous. But that's me, speaking from my perspective.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I used to make icons, which is nothing like creating unique art, but someone reposted them once as hers and I was furious (and I'm a generally calm person). How someone feels when they've created the image themselves I hate to think.
no subject
no subject
I reported the first person who did it, and it was taken care of in less than a day (you go, Tumblr support!). After that, I never really bothered to let them know anymore cause as soon as the post gets a few reblogs on Tumblr, there isn't really much you can do cause it's out there, whether they delete the "original" post from the reposter's blog or not.
These days, I make sure to always make my watermark/signature hard to crop out (in the center of the pic, rather than the corners), so that even if it does get reposted, people can find the original source.
For fests... I like
There's no ideal solution, but putting the DO NOT STEAL note ON the artwork, rather than below it would probably help a lot already :)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
It wouldn't have been so galling if they had put big captions: Art by anon at the merlin_art_fest. Although it'd still be wrong because THE ART FEST HASN'T CONCLUDED. argh.
no subject
no subject
It doesn't only happen here, it also happens on DA, that's the sad thing. You can point out that you don't want your art reposted without permission as much as you like, you'll always find enough morons to ignore you completely.
Oh, and what's really bad about it, some absolutely fabulous artists like Sherant and others have completely disappeared, and don't even post original art anywhere. :(
no subject
For me, I figure that the process of creating the art is as much a part of the satisfaction I get as any comments I might receive. It's amazingly lovely to get positive feedback, and that helps fuel the creative engine, but my pieces don't generate huge amounts of traffic. Like, ever. Not even when they were recced "for me" on tumblr, which is something to be thankful for, I guess.
And YES, there is always the "but I didn't see it" or "but this is DIFFERENT" people. Sigh.
Sad to know it's led to artists leaving fandoms. We're all the poorer when someone steals someone else's creation.
no subject
Lol, I've stopped doing fanart because I thought exactly that: No traffic, no danger. Nobody would bother to steal the things I post now because they're neither mainsteam nor popular. I still enjoy the creative process, and I have a handful of nice people on DA who seem to like my style, whatever I post, so I'm quite happy with my small circle, and I'm not worried about my pics cropping up on Tumblr or other sites of that kind. :D
It certainly has it perks not to be overly popular. *grins* Makes one less vulnerable and not such a subject of greed.
I'm really very saddened by the disappearance of some of my favourites. They were high quality arstist, and now I cannot find anything by them anymore. ;_; I guess they got fed up with the like-it-grab-it mentality.
no subject
The feedback makes you want to make MORE. So, yes, leaving happy thoughts and praise for any creative is just a feel-good positive feedback loop. And asking is just POLITE.
In a way, being in that place between NNF and BNF is fairly uncomfortable for me. If I'm a NNF, I get no love at all, but no one would take my stuff. If I'm a BNF, it's obvious when something is mine, and therefore it's not any harder to steal but more obvious that it IS stolen because it's recognizable to a lot of fans as being MINE. Somewhere in between is where your stuff gets noticed, pinched, and the person gets away with it. And most artist's are in that in between place.
But yes, it's always sad to see a talented artist chased off by piracy. That just sucks. :(
no subject
True, true! Recognition and feedback are a mighty fuel to creativity. As for asking, well, the online generation apparently still has to learn manners, which wouldn't be easy, I guess.
TBH I've never actually been a real fan. I got sucked into that world by a coincidence, when I stumbled upon
Some aspects I liked, but some bothered me quite a lot. Greed, drama and art theft were the ones that annoyed me most.
Ah, well, it's behind me, now, but it took me quite a while to extricate myself from that entanglement. I guess something similar is what happened with some of those artists. The negative aspects of fandom just overpowered the good ones. One feels so helpless at times. (After doing some research recently, I've actually discovered quite a lot of my art on Tumblr, which makes me want to growl - and not in a good way. Not one single pic was posted there with my permission. Well, there was a link referring to my DA page, but if I hadn't done the research, I'd never have known.)
OK, so that's enough of a rant, lol. I'm sorry to have bothered you with my blabber.<3
no subject
no subject
One thing I have noticed is that fandom treats art and fic differently. As if creating art is somehow easier (well to me it is, but that's completely besides the point) and as such requires less respect. You are so right. No one would ever post a whole fic without citing the author, but I frequently find art without reference to the artist.
*sigh*
no subject
And yes, I think it has to do with the fact that humans are so very visual, and we can process those 1000 words the art is giving to us in picture form in less than a second. Fic just takes longer to absorb. Art is almost instantaneous.